In Search of Marketing's Hard Edge
It is a truth almost universally acknowledged that
marketing is a vital contributor to corporate and broader economic success. "Marketing,"
management commentator Peter Drucker observed in 1954, "is not a function,
it is the whole business seen from the customer's view." Drucker's comment
is as relevant today as it was 50 years ago.
Yet, in the majority of large companies the influence, status
and reputation of marketing and marketers is limited. CIM research found that
only 20 companies in the FTSE 100 have a marketer on the board of directors. Of
the top 20 companies in the Fortune 500, only one, General Electric, has a Chief
Marketing Officer.
This lack of representation has a negative impact on support
for the marketing function. Figures from the Outsourcing Institute in the US show
that 13 per cent of US companies are outsourcing aspects of their sales and marketing
activities. A recent survey of companies from The Times 1000, found that
fewer than 57 per cent of finance directors believed investment in marketing was
necessary for long-term corporate growth; 27 per cent thought marketing investment
to be only a short-term tactical measure; and 32 per cent said marketing was the
first budget they would cut in hard times.
There has been much debate among leading marketing thinkers
over the reasons for the low-standing of marketing. The late Professor Peter Doyle
attributed marketing's low status to its association with cost; image problems;
a perception of being customer rather than shareholder driven; and poor positioning
in most organisations. Professor Robert Shaw of Cranfield School of Management
has also identified a number shortcomings including the fact that marketing: doesn't
drive strategic decisions; struggles to win business cases; and has blind faith
in customer satisfaction.
One common theme is accountability. Ask the senior executives,
the CEOs and finance directors, and the perception is that marketing isn't accountable.
That marketing activities can't be related to the bottom line.
In recent years the situation has worsened. Business has shifted its focus from
creating value for the customers to creating value for shareholders and other
stakeholders. The value created by marketing spending is increasingly called in
question.
Driving future success
Low status and limited strategic impact mean that marketers and marketing are
now at a crossroads. "As a profession we still face the challenge to 'prove
it' and like anything to do with future valuation it is difficult," noted
Andrew Marsden, marketing director at Britvic Soft Drinks in a speech given to
the Worshipful Company of Marketers earlier this year.
What is clear is that the future of marketing rests squarely
on its ability to make a demonstrable contribution to the success of the business.
This in turn depends on its ability to create value for stakeholders - and to
demonstrate that ability to the entire business community.
So, how can marketing drive business success in the future? How can marketing
shake off the legacy of the past to connect more directly and constructively with
the CEO agenda?
The answer lies in something the CIM's Insights team has labeled
hard-edged marketing.
Hard-edged marketing is the application of robust business
metrics to marketing activities to create demonstrably superior value for all
stakeholders. The result: optimal marketing-driven decisions, strategy and organisation.
Hard-edged marketing is not a panacea. Rather, it is a way
of practising and thinking about marketing - a marketing philosophy. At its heart
is the recognition that marketing does not exist in a creative or a commercial
vacuum. Marketing activities must be directly linked to organisational goals.
As such, the impact of marketing activities should be judged against the organisation's
key performance indicators.
Hard-edged marketing is about understanding the marketing
levers that operate on other parts of the business to create value over time.
It may be defined in terms of creating value for a wide group of stakeholders
- including employees, customers and shareholders. The key is identifying the
drivers and linking them to corporate performance.
Hard-edged marketing does not mean donning the marketing equivalent
of a straitjacket. Marketing performance measures need to be flexible enough to
cope with changes in organisational priorities. The marketing agenda - and metrics
- should mirror and support the evolving CEO agenda. Hard-edged marketing must
also be flexible enough to adapt to shifts in business objectives. Understood
and practised in this way, hard-edged marketing will enable marketers to shape
and drive the emergent value agenda.
A hard-edged approach
There are three key elements to hard-edged marketing: a broad interpretation of
value; the use of metrics to assess the contribution to value creation of marketing
activities; and the alignment of the organisation behind how value is interpreted
and the metrics used.
The concept of value is central. But value is an elusive concept.
Its definition changes according to perspective. For customers it may be about
the perceived value of the brand, of the benefits that it and related products
and services deliver. For shareholders, value is about long-term return on their
investment.
It is not the marketing function's role to determine which
notion of value is the prevailing one. This is the subject of a wider debate.
Marketers must, however, be able to measure the effectiveness of marketing activities
in terms of delivering value to different stakeholders.
For example, in a company where the emphasis is on delivering
value to shareholders, marketing activities might be assessed on how they impact
on economic profit -- the net operating profit after taxes minus the cost of capital.
In this scenario a company will add value over time when there is an operating
profit in excess of the cost of capital.
It may be possible to create value for customers without creating
an economic profit. A price promotion may, for example, be a loss making activity
for the company yet create exceptional value for the customer. Over the long term
this is not a sustainable position. The reality for most firms is the need to
view value in a wider sense and strike a balance between the interests of all
stakeholders.
Metrically speaking
The second key is the use of metrics. Tim Ambler of London Business School describes
metrics as "a performance measure that top management should review.. a measure
that matters to the whole business".
Hard-edged marketing is not about producing measures for their
own sake - as has tended to happen in the past - or about feting one metric to
the exception of all others. It is about measuring the few things that really
matter. If we accept that marketers need to be accountable and create value, then
marketers must measure the key drivers of value within the marketing function.
The metrics used should be the most appropriate for that driver.
In recent years, a broad range of marketing measures has been
developed. In their 2002 Working Paper Assessing Market Performance: The Current
State of Metrics Tim Ambler, Flora Kokkinaki and Stefano Puntoni identified
19 key marketing metrics. One of the best known and most developed, for example,
is that of brand equity. Attempts are being made by Ambler and others to establish
the link between brand equity and future cashflow so that the contribution that
brands make to value creation can be quantified in a way that is more easily understood
in the boardroom.
Another approach is to use metrics that enable activities
to be assessed in terms of the shareholder value they create. In this case marketing
activities might be assessed using specific metrics devised to assess impact on
shareholder value such as economic profit, and other proprietary measures like
Economic Value Added, devised by consulting firm Stern Stewart.
If marketers do not take the initiative in selecting robust
metrics they are likely to have metrics thrust upon them. Writing in On Brand
and Branding Don Schultz, Professor of Integrated Marketing Communications,
at Northwestern University observes: "We can hold onto the attitudinal measures
we have developed but which can't be related to financial returns. In short, we
can stay with marketing's version of the annual audit. Or we can rethink and rework
our approaches and our measurement systems because, if we don't, the accountants
and financial people will.
"They're headed forward, not looking backward as so many
of our marketing metrics do. So if we're not going to be overtaken by the accountants,
we'd better get started developing relevant marketing and branding metrics --
and soon."
In alignment
It is not enough simply to identify key drivers of value and measure them. If
marketers wish to remain influential a hard-edged marketing approach must be embedded
within the organisation.
For a start the company must act on the performance measures.
If shareholder value creation is the desired outcome and metrics are introduced
to measure the impact of marketing activities on shareholder value then it is
essential that the company acts on data from those metrics. This may seem obvious
but it is possible that the action require may be unpalatable or counter intuitive
and initially encounter resistance within the organisation.
As CEO of Cadbury Schweppes John Sunderland negotiated the
sale of a large proportion of the company's soft drinks portfolio outside the
US to competitor Coca-Cola. At first sight it was not an obvious deal to make
but when considered against Sunderland's avowed aim to create shareholder value
it made good commercial sense. As he said at the time: "This deal with Coca-Cola
will create immediate and substantial value for our shareowners."
His commitment to the creation of shareholder value through
the reevaluation of the brand portfolio was clear from his further comment: "These
brands are famous and profitable. However, we have recognised that outside the
USA they can be more successfully grown within the broader international infrastructure
which Coca-Cola has established over many years." A good example of how value
creation may seem counter-intuitive.
Meeting the challenge
Implementing a hard-edged marketing strategy is not something that can be done
overnight. For example, it requires marketers to learn new skills, skills such
as financial literacy and statistical analysis. Marketers must be able to measure
and communicate progress, in particular by connecting improved performance with
business results and economic value-added by marketing activities.
The professional bodies, marketing consultancies and training
companies are making strides toward equipping marketers with much needed measurement
and evaluation skills. But there is still a gap between theory and practice, and
more needs to be done to help marketers translate evaluation techniques into practical
applicable tools.
Central to hard-edged marketing is the realisation that, if
it is to drive business success, marketing must undergo a fundamental change in
attitude and direction. It must overcome the long-standing obstacles to achieving
influence at board level and persuade the business world at large of its strategic
importance. It must embrace metrics in an attempt to connect with opinion formers
and decision makers who often attach more importance to the language of finance
than what they perceive as the ethereal world of creatives.
If, and it is a big if, it can do this then marketing may
achieve a long desired shift in perceptions and cement itself firmly at the heart
of the organisation. Failure to do so and what is currently a small trickle of
outsourcing marketing activities may become a torrent.
Hard-Edged
Training Courses
If you'd like to learn more about putting the best ideas into practice, CIM has
a stretching collection of "Hard-Edged Marketing" training courses available
that can help. This kicks off with Marketing Director Masterclasses laying down
the challenge "Are you ready to step across marketing's new frontier?"
Other courses for everyone include Hard-Edged Decisions, Hard-Edged
Measurement, Hard-Edged Brands and Hard-Edged Strategy. A range of new courses
will also be introduced including "Vision and Values" and "How
to Value Brands".
Click on the links below to view further course information.
Vision
and Values; the core of the brand (a three-day master class delivered in two parts)
Beyond
The Covers: Understanding Marketing Design (One Day Workshop)
Hard
Edged Results: How Marketing Drives Shareholder Value (One Day Workshop)
Marketing
Metrics and ROI
Hard
Edged Measurement: Marketing Metrics - Measuring Marketing Performance
Hard
Edged Decisions: Marketing Management and Decision Making
Selling
Techniques, Advanced (One Day Workshop)
Hard
Edged Strategy: The Marketing Strategy Programme
Hard
Edged Brands: Brand Growth from Adding Value
Value
Based Brand Management
|